item_5.01_-__general_plan_strategy_endorsement_part1.pdf |
item_5.01_-__general_plan_strategy_endorsement_part2.pdf |
item_5.01_-__general_plan_strategy_endorsement_part3.pdf |
|
Hot off the presses! The document was so large we had to break it into three downloads. Thanks to Bruce England for posting this earlier.
0 Comments
This document is in reference to the November 16 City Council meeting agenda item 5.01. ("That the City Council endorse the proposed General Plan Strategy, including the Environmental Planning Commission's comments on draft General Plan policy direction. This endorsement will serve to initiate and focus the development of the the Draft General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). ")
Downloading documents from the City web site is not very user friendly, especially for documents longer than 75 pages (this one is 99 pages), so here it is in pdf format for your convenience. Enjoy!
Dear Mayor Bryant, Vice Mayor Siegel, and Members of the Mountain View City Council,
The Mountain View Coalition for Sustainable Planning appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft General Plan strategy, land use map, and policies (agenda item 5.01). Overall, we are very pleased that the draft plan reflects the community’s clear direction to design a network of healthy, sustainable villages that provide City residents and workers more choices for where to live and how to get around. The General Plan takes some important steps toward achieving the ‘network of villages’ vision, such as focusing higher intensity development near transit centers and along transit corridors, and planning a mix of residential, commercial, service, and entertainment uses for the North Bayshore Area. However, we believe that some additional steps are necessary to ensure that the community’s vision comes to fruition. For example: Increased intensity of development to support self-sustaining villages The General Plan clearly articulates the goals of creating new retail and services within walking distances for residents and supporting non-auto mobility improvements for transit, walking, or biking. However, in order to support frequent transit service and convenient amenities, the General Plan must encourage and incentivize land uses at high enough intensities to create a sufficient customer base for shops and transit. MVCSP’s understanding is that Mountain View’s own internal economic studies have shown that under the guidelines of the currently proposed land use map, the City would fall short of achieving its goal of creating locally serving retail and improved transit. Accompanying this email you will find a table of statistics from reputable sources that we have compiled to illustrate that in order to achieve particular services (such as locally serving retail) a certain number of people are required. Please refer to this table for more detail. More generally, to ensure that the General Plan land use map supports self-sustaining villages, Council should direct staff to increase densities in the major change areas. See below for some specific recommendations that support increased densities for the General Plan focus areas.
|
Categories
All
Archives
April 2024
|